nerdycookies asked: This is a question that's been troubling me since high school. One of my philosophy of biology teachers said that viruses are not alive, because they're not made up of cells. Something about this logic strikes me as circular. What do you think? Are viruses alive?
We were actually just discussing this in my Cell and Molecular biology class this morning. It really depends on the definition of life being used. Most definitions of life do not allow for viruses, leaving the cell as the basic unit of life based on several criteria (self regulation, ability to replicate, acquiring and using energy, etc). Viruses replicate themselves by infecting host cells and cannot do so without a host, cells replicate by copying DNA and organelles. If you define life as the ability to replicate, then yes, viruses are alive. My professor went on to say that if you can grow it in a dish, it’s alive. Viruses cannot be grown in a dish since they require a host cell to replicate themselves. So, really, it is up to you to decide how you define life by scientific standards and whether or not that definition includes or does not include viruses.
Thanks so much for the great question! Any other thoughts on this, please direct them to my ask box! *points below* Ask me a question. You know you wanna. *wink*